by Noah Matheu Sheer 11-13-2010 06:16 PM
As if it wasn't bad enough that Lamar Odom gets exorbitant fines for committing a flagrant foul and then fined again for voicing his opinion to the referee. He'll now fight an uphill battle challenging the IRS for back-taxes over...semantics?
Odom has filed suit against the Internal Revenue Service because it would not allow him to deduct $12,000 in fines and $127,000 for fitness training. The 31-year-old Lakers forward is suing the IRS for sending him a tax bill of $87,000 for 2007, according to Forbes.com. The bill included $9,000 in interest. Odom claimed $9.3 million in adjusted gross income that year, and has more recently signed a multi-year deal with the Lakers for up to $33 million.
The recent IRS power-play against Lamar brings to light an age old argument of what exactly is a tax deductible expense.
Internal Revenue Code Title 26, Section 162 details what are deductible and non-deductible trade or business expenses. The Code, laws passed by Congress and interpreted and enforced by the IRS, states that deductible expenses must be "ordinary and necessary" and may not be an illegal payment to government officials or employees. Congress defines "fines and penalties" as they relate to illegal activities, Illegal kickbacks, and bribes.
Section 162 does not address verbal abuse of referees, flagrant fouls or even showing up late to practice. The issue here is that in professional sports, infractions committed while in the performance of the athlete's profession for which he was hired is not a "fine or penalty" as defined by Congress. These employer-imposed infractions are rules enforced by professional athletic organizations to discipline their employees.
Therefore, it is reasonable for Odom to assert that employer-imposed fines constitute ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on one's own trade or business.
Publication 17, the IRS's interpretation of the Code, discusses "maintaining your current job skills" as a deductible item. According to the NBA Uniform Player Contract:
(a) A Player agrees to report at the time and place fixed by the Team in good physical condition and to keep himself throughout each NBA Season in good physical condition.
(b) If the Player, in the judgment of the Team's physician, is not in good physical condition at the date of his first scheduled game for the Team, or if, at the beginning of or during any season, he fails to remain in good physical condition so as to render the Player, in the judgment of the Team's physician, unfit to play skilled basketball, the Team shall have the right to suspend such Player until such time as, in the judgment of the Team's physician, the Player is in sufficiently good physical condition to play skilled basketball. In the event of such suspension, the Base Compensation payable to the Player for any Season during such suspension shall be reduced...
As a condition of the player's employment—detailed in his contract—he must maintain not only good physical condition, but sufficiently good physical condition to play skilled basketball. The cost in maintaining his current job skills, as required by his employer specified in the employment contract, is not a personal expense. Therefore, his training costs appear to be fully deductible according to IRS Publication 17. Training costs to maintain a physical condition sufficient to perform at the level of a professional athlete may require specialized athletic and medical equipment as well as skilled professionals to assist in conditioning.
Tax planning, preparation, and representation in front of the IRS are best handled by professionals skilled in these areas. The rules are complicated, confusing, and not well defined. In this situation, Lamar Odom is experiencing some of the most gray areas of our tax code that even tax professionals continue to debate and the IRS continues to interpret to their advantage. The most concerning matter in Lamar Odom's case is that he has chose to represent himself in front of the IRS. Lamar, you didn't do so well in arguing your position with the referee, what makes you think you'll do better with the IRS?
Noah Matheu Sheer
Director - Sports & Entertainment
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Published 11-13-2010 © 2022 Access Athletes, LLC
Access Athletes, LLC owns the exclusive copyright to all information contained within the articles posted on The Real Athlete Blog. All information is for the End User's use only and may not be sold, redistributed, or otherwise used for commercial purposes without the expressed consent of Access Athletes, LLC. The information is an educational aid only and it is not intended as and nor shall it be construed as legal, medical, financial, psychological or other professional advice or treatment for individual situations, conditions, or predicaments. The information provided in The Real Athlete Blog articles shall not constitute an attorney-client, doctor-patient, psychologist-patient relationship or any other professional-client relationship for that matter. The End User shall seek the advice or treatment of his or her own qualified licensed professional(s) and the End User shall not rely on the information contained herein as such. End Users who leave comments on the Blog articles or email the contributors personally shall have no expectation of privilege or confidentiality. Additionally, we strongly recommend that you consult your doctor, nurse, nutritionist or pharmacist before following any of our workout or nutrition regimens to ensure that it is safe and effective for you.
Access Athletes, LLC makes no representation or warranties as to the information, opinions, or other services or data you may access, download or use as a result of accessing The Real Athlete Blog. All implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose or use are hereby excluded. Access Athletes, LLC does not assume any responsibility for your use of or reliance on any of the information provided by The Real Athlete Blog.